<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Down the Rabbit Hole with Canon&#8217;s AF Microadjustment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonroemer.com/blog/2009/05/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-canons-af-microadjustment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonroemer.com/blog/2009/05/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-canons-af-microadjustment/</link>
	<description>Jon Roemer&#039;s Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 18:40:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learning to See - Canon 24 f/1.4L II &#38; 70-200 f/2.8L IS II Lenses</title>
		<link>http://www.jonroemer.com/blog/2009/05/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-canons-af-microadjustment/comment-page-1/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator>Learning to See - Canon 24 f/1.4L II &#38; 70-200 f/2.8L IS II Lenses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 02:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.32.6.157/~jroemer/blog/?p=36#comment-335</guid>
		<description>[...] I continue to shoot with both of these lenses neither disappoints. Neither has needed an AF microadjustment and both lock focus quickly and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I continue to shoot with both of these lenses neither disappoints. Neither has needed an AF microadjustment and both lock focus quickly and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Roemer</title>
		<link>http://www.jonroemer.com/blog/2009/05/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-canons-af-microadjustment/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Roemer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 13:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.32.6.157/~jroemer/blog/?p=36#comment-19</guid>
		<description>I tested the lens at 70mm and with it focused at 11.5 feet (70mm x 50 = 3500mm = 350cm = 11.5 feet.
This is following the method Chuck W. recommends.  He also did say that if there is a particular focal length you use often, you could try testing at that setting.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tested the lens at 70mm and with it focused at 11.5 feet (70mm x 50 = 3500mm = 350cm = 11.5 feet.<br />
This is following the method Chuck W. recommends.  He also did say that if there is a particular focal length you use often, you could try testing at that setting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rajat Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://www.jonroemer.com/blog/2009/05/down-the-rabbit-hole-with-canons-af-microadjustment/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>rajat Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 08:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.32.6.157/~jroemer/blog/?p=36#comment-18</guid>
		<description>hi
for 24 - 70 ,
what dist and at what mm did u do the tests ?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi<br />
for 24 &#8211; 70 ,<br />
what dist and at what mm did u do the tests ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

