Updates to my web site, www.jonroemer.com, add images to the recent work galleries in the People and Architecture sections. Some of the images have been previewed here, others are new.
ShareLink: Email • Twitter • FacebookWeb Site Updates
June 26th, 2008 § 0
New Home Page Image
June 24th, 2008 § 0
2008 – New Architecture
June 23rd, 2008 § 0
2008 – New Portraits 2
June 18th, 2008 § 0
Some more new portraits…
From the assignment shot outside the United Nations, referenced in a recent blog entry:

From an editorial assignment:

The subjects, Trudi Schupbach and Eric Wieschaus, are married. Both are biologists at Princeton University and both work with fruit flies. Eric won the 1995 Nobel Prize in Physiology. They were great subjects.
When I scouted locations I was a bit at odds with what to do. I needed to get a photo of them together, a more formal portrait. Their labs, as are most university research labs, are very chaotic, more so than I wanted for the portrait. Once I saw the double microscope that was it. I knew it was perfect to use as a prop and a metaphor for their work. We set up in a nearby seminar room. I made a faux ringflash using three small softboxes and Trudi and Eric were game to try many different poses.
Firefox 3 – Joins the 21st Century
June 17th, 2008 § 0
Firefox 3 was released today. From my web stats I know that more and more PC users are using Firefox instead of MS Explorer. So, I thought I’d point out that under Firefox 3 you can now view images online correctly and *accurately. Unbeknownst to most users, Firefox 2 and earlier did not display images correctly.
Of course, getting FireFox 3 to handle images properly takes an extra step or two (Firefox neglected to make it simple by adding a check box in the preferences) but it’s easy and painless to get it to fall into line.
You can edit the color management setting in Firefox by entering “about:config” in Firefox 3′s address bar, agreeing to accept the risk of voiding the Firefox warranty (what risk?, Firefox is free and you can always re-download it) and then typing “gfx” in the filter field. Last step is to double-click the gfx.color_management.enable line to change “False” to “True” and you are all set.
If you are not comfortable working under the hood then you can download a Color Management add-on.
*Following either of the above methods will enable Firefox 3 to present images as they were intended to be seen. Ideally, you still need to calibrate your monitor but using a web browser that can display images correctly is the first step in seeing the true color and tone of image files when they are presented online.
Background Info
International Color Consortium (ICC) Web Browser Color Test
MozillaLinks Blog on Firefox 3 Color Management
ShareLink: Email • Twitter • FacebookWhat Earns $70 Billion and is as Large as an Army?
June 12th, 2008 § 0
Answer: Artists working in the United States.
The National Endowment for the Arts has compiled census data to give a picture of artists in the United States through 2005. There are just shy of 2 million artists, 1.4% of the work force, and photographers total just under 150,000 (7.4% of all artists). Overall, 60% of photographers are men but under age 35 60% of photographers are women.
The report debunks one major myth about artists, that artists are for the most part unemployed and marginal, as it found that only 13% of the people whose primary occupation is as an artist also have a second job. Digging deeper though, just shy of half the photographers are full-year, full-time workers.
Additional Photographer Details:
-More than 80% of photographers are non-Hispanic white but the field is becoming more diverse. The proportion for non-Hispanic white photographers under 35 is 73%.
-The median age in the field is 39 with the majority over 35.
-Over 40% of photographers are self-employed.
-The median income of photographers, $26,300, is lower than the median for artists and lower than the median for the US work force. The median income for male photographers, $35,500, is more than the double the median income for female photographers, $16,300.
-If you only look at full-year, full-time photographers the median income is $37,600 which is more than than the national median income, $30,100.
-In New Jersey, my home state, the number of photographers dropped by 18% between 1990 and 2005.
In his preface to the report, NEA Chairman, Dana Gioia, writes:
Compared to other U.S. workers, American artists tend to be better educated and more entrepreneurial. Artists are twice as likely to have earned a college degree as other members of the U.S. labor force, though they receive relatively less financial compensation for their educational level. Artists are also 3.5 times more likely to be self-employed. American artists have learned to be creative not merely in their chosen fields but also in how they manage their lives.
He concludes with:
From global exports to local investments, the new American economy depends on imagination, innovation, and creativity, and those are the skills that artists develop, nurture, and promote. Isn’t it time that the nation notices?
New York Times Article on the Report
NEA “Artists in the Workforce, 1990-2005″ Report
ShareLink: Email • Twitter • FacebookHot Time, Spring(?) in the City
June 11th, 2008 § 0

New York, NY, 06/10/08
Shot portraits in three locations in Manhattan yesterday. First location was just outside the entrance to the UN. Heat index was around 105o. Luckily, the first subject was cool as a cucumber.
We also got to experience first hand some of New York’s recent spate of objects falling from the sky. While we were scouting locations we stopped in a deli in Tudor City, moments later, directly outside the deli, a large section of detailing on the building fell crushing the front end of car and taking out a motorcycle. No one was in or on either, nor standing at the corner where it occurred, so fortunately no one was hurt.
ShareLink: Email • Twitter • FacebookCD and DVD State of the Union
June 8th, 2008 § 0
In the past few years delivering image files has shifted from CD’s to one of three options: DVD’s, External Hard Drives or Internet Transfer. Which of the three is most appropriate depends upon file sizes, overall job size, speed and convenience. External Hard Drives are most appropriate for large jobs as Internet Transfer is when speed is the mitigating factor. In the middle is delivery of the assignment on disc and a confluence of factors has brought DVD delivery to the forefront – DVD drives have become ubiquitous, the price of DVD discs have fallen, camera file sizes have grown bigger and the speed of DVD burning has increased.
DVD vs. CD
This is an easy choice. A CD holds about 680mb and a DVD 4.4gb (both after formatting). So, if you are delivering large or multiple files that exceed 680mb the DVD is a no brainer. Beyond that though things get iffy… Which media is more archival?
What’s surprising is that a CD is more archival and more fragile. It sounds counterintuitive. High quality CD’s stored under good conditions are estimated to last 100 years or more; that’s great and beats DVD estimates by 3x. CD’s, though, have a backing layer (the top of the CD) adjacent to the data layer. So, a scratch or a mar to that backing layer can make the CD unreadable. DVD’s have a layer in between the top and the data layer. So, a scratch or a mar on the top surface is less likely to affect the readability of a DVD. A stored CD is likely to last much longer than a DVD but a DVD is more likely to stand up to repeated handling.
Disc Delivery – Branding or Lack Thereof
In order to insure the least amount of issues when delivering images on disc I do the following:
-I do not use labels. Labels can come off and destroy a CD/DVD drive, labels can come off rendering a CD unreadable.
-I don’t print on my CD’s or DVD’s via a thermal or inkjet printer. It’s still not clear if printing on a disc will affect its longevity but given the time it takes to burn and verify a disc the possibility of messing up a disc by printing on it is just not worth it.
-Every disc is verified to make sure it burned properly. This is a software process that compares the data on the just burned disc to the actual data on your hard drive.
-Every disc is burned to be compatible with Mac and Widows operating systems.
-I only write on the disc on the inner ring where no data is written.
-I use a solvent free pen to write on the disc. While some people say any marker is fine the consensus is that solvent free ink is the most archival way to go.
-I burn a pdf of the disc cover (contains job information and contents) onto the disc. This keeps the information about the disc with the disc even if the disc and its case part company.
Delivering discs with a nice label or printed top would certainly look better but in this case simplicity is best and providing a problem free disc makes the most sense.
What About Blu-Ray
I get asked this a lot but it’s too early to ask the question. It’ll be a number of years before blu-ray is in wide enough use by computer manufacturers, photographers and their clients to make it viable. It also presents its own problems. Blu-ray will take at least twice as long as DVD to burn. I’m sure even longer to verify. It’s already frustrating enough when a DVD doesn’t pass verification and needs to burned again. To have that happen with 25gb blu-ray discs when you are trying to make a FedEx deadline could be problematic. It may be better to stick with DVD’s.
Some Background Information
NIST CD and DVD Care and Handling Guide
CD and DVD Markers (Google product names to find vendors)
Sharpie CD/DVD Permanent Marker
Update 6/14/08
Delkin has announced Archival Gold Blu-Ray BD-R discs. They claim a service life of over 200 years. The discs start at $27 each. This is still more expensive than DVD’s, gold DVD’s are about $3 ea, and six dvd’s are close in capacity to one BD-R. Other factors, as mentioned above, are still to be determined as to whether this will work for client delivery and while it may eventually become a viable backup medium for photographers it’s still a ways off.








